More news from OutdoorWire

OutdoorWire

OutdoorWire

Portal page for OutdoorWire Access and Landuse Central Read More
4x4Voice

4x4Voice

California OHV recreation news and information Read More
MUIRNet-News

MUIRNet-News

News and information about outdoor recreation Read More
4x4Wire

4x4Wire

Off road recreation and news and information Read More
TrailTalk Forums

TrailTalk Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums for 4x4 tech information Read More
  • 1
Search 4x4Wire for more on OHV recreation and 4x4 Tech
Custom Search
Chief

WHAT IS A SPECIAL RECREATION PERMIT?

WHAT IS A SPECIAL RECREATION PERMIT?

Types of permits:

Special Recreation Permits are authorizations which allow specified recreational uses of the public lands and related waters. They are issued as a means to manage visitor use, protect natural and cultural resources, and provide a mechanism to accommodate commercial recreational uses. Authorized by the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, there are five types of uses for which these permits are required: commercial, competitive, vending, individual or group use in special areas, and organized group activity and event use.

1. Commercial Use – Commercial Use is defined as recreational use of public lands and related waters for business or financial gain. When any person, group, or organization makes or attempts to make a profit, receive money, amortize equipment, or obtain goods or services, as compensation from participants in recreational activities occurring on public lands, the use is considered commercial.

Examples: Outfitters and guides, jeep tours, horse trail and wagon train rides, cattle drives, and photography associated with a recreational activity.

Continue reading
8197 Hits
0 Comments
Chief

Forest Certification

Forest Certification

National Forest System (NFS) Certification Study: An Evaluation of the Application of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Standards on Five National Forest System Management Units is now available. This report, produced for the Forest Service, documents the study in which third-party auditors evaluated current forest management practices on five study national forest units with standards set by two certification programs, SFI and FSC, for private and state-owned forests in the U.S. The report summarizes and discusses the five third-party evaluations and captures lessons learned through a review of participant experiences.

The study was designed to help the Forest Service: 1) evaluate the potential consistency of certification with the Forest Service’s existing mission to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations, 2) evaluate the potential benefits and costs of third-party certification of national forests and grasslands to externally developed standards, and 3) study the lessons learned as a basis for determining what policy and management changes might be needed in the event the Forest Service were to pursue certification.

Read more about Forest Certification at: http://www.fs.fed.us/projects/forestcertification/index.shtml

2070 Hits
0 Comments
Chief

Recreation Site - Facility Master Planning (RS-FMP)

Recreation Site - Facility Master Planning (RS-FMP)John StewartNatural Resource ConsultantCalifornia Association of 4 Wheel Drive ClubsThe Recreation Site - Facility Master Planning (RS-FMP) is a U.S. Forest Service process of national scope with local forest emphasis. Each national forest will use this process to create a 5-year proposed "Program of Work" to better manage and improve the quality of our recreation sites. All forests are scheduled to complete this initial phase of the RS-FMP process by the end of 2007.RS-FMP is an administrative process for evaluating existing developed recreation facilities and projecting future management of them. Preliminary RS-FMP results have increased public interest and media attention, particularly in the western United States. Questions have been raised about the level and timing of public participation throughout the process. As a response to this increased scrutiny, a comprehensive public participation review was initiated by Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth in late January 2007. The report documents the findings and recommendations of the Review Team completed on March 30, 2007. A copy of the report is available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/rsfmp/2300-rsfmp-rev-team-report-05-16-2007.pdfWhat Is RSFMP?RS-FMP is an analysis tool developed nationally to help forests align their developed recreation sites with the unique characteristics of the forest, projected recreation demand, visitor expectations, and revenue. National forests across the country are undertaking this process. RS-FMP is driven by four strategic goals:1. Provide recreation opportunities best suited for the national forest;2. Operate and maintain recreation sites to meet national quality standards;3. Eliminate/reduce recreation-site deferred maintenance.4. Enhance recreation experiences.A seven-step process is used to evaluate and prioritize sites for action. The results are contained in a proposed 5-year program of work. Public feedback is sought to ensure that these actions are sound and responsive to visitor needs. Annually, phases of the program of work are implemented; additional public participation is conducted at that time.Seven Step ProcessThe RS-FMP process involves seven steps, each bringing the Forest's developed recreation sites in closer alignment with its unique characteristics, projected demand, visitor expectations and available revenue.STEP 1: Prepare Site DataUpdate and complete recreation site data for the Forest's developed sites, to provide information needed to make recreation management decisions for those sites.STEP 2: Develop Recreation Niche for the ForestIdentify the recreation program “Niche,” or vision for the Forest, based on public desires and the unique characteristics of the forest. The Niche will help guide management of the Forest recreation program for the coming decade.STEP 3: Identify Operational EfficienciesRecreation sites are examined to determine if they can be operated more efficiently or reduce site management costs and uncompleted maintenance work. Proposed options to increase operational efficiency are developed for each site.STEP 4: Rank Recreation SitesRecreation sites are rated through evaluation of their contribution to the Forest recreation program Niche; their financial and operational efficiency; their effects on environmental sustainability; and their effects on community stability. A proposed ranking of all sites is developed based on the individual site evaluations.STEP 5: Propose 5-year Program of Work to StakeholdersThe proposed 5-year program of work for recreation sites is prepared based upon the analysis completed in the previous four steps. Discussions with stakeholders are sought to explore alternative ways of operating sites and providing desired recreational services.STEP 6: Finalize 5-year Proposed Program of WorkThe 5-year program of work for recreation sites is refined, based upon information from stakeholders.STEP 7: ImplementationAnnually, site-specific projects are proposed to implement the 5-year program of work for recreation sites. Prior to implementation, National Environmental Policy Act and other agency coordination requirements are completed.Public ParticipationThe Forest Service recognizes the importance of these sites and welcomes public comments and suggestions during this process. Public participation is important to ensure that the results of the RS-FMP process meet visitor needs and offer the best recreation opportunities in places important to people.To track status of this program, check the web site for your local national forest. You will find links to all National Forests and Grasslands at: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/map/finder.shtmlForest recreation managers invite members of the public to work with them to identify how to best address these sites and specifically react to the proposed program of work. For more information about RS-FMP, refer to: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/rsfmp/index.shtml

 

2699 Hits
0 Comments
John Stewart

Roads by Definition

Roads by Definitionby: John StewartNatural Resources ConsultantCalifornia Association of 4 Wheel Drive ClubsThe Forest Service is embarked on a mission to evaluate and designate routes of travel within the National Forest System. The final product will be a Motor Vehicle Use Map. The central theme of the MVUM is to designate the routes of travel open for public use. Current policy stipulates the MVUM will be subject to annual review and update.The map will highlight the terms and definitions which are provided below. The USDA Forest Service recognizes five road maintenance levels (Source: Forest Service Handbook 7709.58.10):Level 1: Is assigned to intermittent service roads during the time they are closed. The closure period must exceed 1 year. Basic maintenance is performed to keep damage to adjacent resources to an acceptable level and to perpetuate the road for future use. The road may be of any type or construction standard or may be managed at any other maintenance level when open. When at level 1, roads are closed to vehicular traffic, but may be open and suitable to non-motorized uses.Level 2: Roads are for high clearance vehicles only. Passenger cars are not a consideration. Traffic levels are minor and usually consist of administrative, permitted, recreation, or other dispersed use.Level 3: Roads are open and maintained for a prudent driver in a standard passenger car. User comfort and convenience are not considered priorities. These roads are typically low speed, single lane with turnouts and spot surfacing.Level 4: Roads provide a moderate degree of user comfort and convenience at moderate travel speeds. Most roads are double lane and aggregate surfaced. Some roads may be single lane, paved, or dust abated.Level 5: Roads provide a high degree of user comfort and convenience. These roads are normally double lane and paved. Some may be aggregate surfaced and dust abated.

Click on the MUIRNet Notebooks (Federal) menu option for additional information about the U.S. Forest Service.

2641 Hits
0 Comments
John Stewart

Objections

Forest Planning Process
STEP FOUR: Objections

WHAT IT IS: The 2005 Forest Service planning regulations do not provide citizens an opportunity for administrative appeal of a final forest plan. Instead, citizens can file an "objection" to a plan before a final decision is made. The objection is submitted to the Forest Service officer one level above the official who will approve the plan. Usually, this will be the Regional Forester, who may instruct the Forest Supervisor to modify the plan or conduct more analysis in response to the objections. Once the forest supervisor makes a final decision, there is no way to challenge it except by going to court.

Continue reading
Tags:
2650 Hits
0 Comments
John Stewart

USFS Region 5 Travel Management Status

The following is USFS Region 5 Travel Management status as of Nov. 17, 2007.

Angeles Status (Updated 9/1/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders N/A - Already have designated systemStep 3 - Proposed Actions Not planning to designate new routesStep 4 - NEPA Not necessary if new routes aren't proposedStep 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Raina Fulton 626-574-5278Cleveland Status (Updated 9/1/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders N/A - Already have designated systemStep 3 - Proposed Actions See motorized route mapsStep 4 - NEPA Fall 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Anne Carey858-674-2977Eldorado Status (Updated 10/25/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders CompleteStep 3 - Proposed Actions CompleteStep 4 - NEPA DEIS completeStep 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact 530-621-5276Humboldt-Toiyabe - Bridgeport District Status (Updated 8/27/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Complete for areas with resource concernsStep 3 - Proposed Actions Winter 2007Step 4 - NEPA Winter 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact David Loomis775-884-8132Humboldt-Toiyabe - Carson District Status (Updated 8/27/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Completed for areas with resource concernsStep 3 - Proposed Actions Fall 2007Step 4 - NEPA Fall 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact David Loomis775-884-8132Inyo Status (Updated 11/01/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Complete -- View Forest Order #04-07-01Step 3 - Proposed Actions Released sample proposals for Mammoth East & Inyo Mountains management areas on January 23Step 4 - NEPA NOI Issued October 1Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Note: Public comment deadline extended to December 15 Forest Service Contact Marty Hornick760-873-2461Klamath Status (Updated 8/1/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Will not undertake - resource conditions don't warrantStep 3 - Proposed Actions Step 4 - NEPA Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2009Forest Service Contact Bob Talley530-841-4423Lassen Status (Updated 10/25/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Forest Order issued June 6, 2007Step 3 - Proposed Actions Discussion Draft ReleasedStep 4 - NEPA NOI Issued October 25Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Allen Nosler530-252-6637Los Padres Status (Updated 10/3/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders N/A - Already have a designated systemStep 3 - Proposed Actions Not planning to propose new routesStep 4 - NEPA Will conduct mixed-use analysis on the Santa Lucia & Mount Pinos Districts in 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Issued MVUMs on the Monterey, Santa Barbara & Ojai Districts in February 2007Forest Service Contact Rick Larson805-961-5744Mendocino Status (Updated 10/16/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders N/A -- Already have designated systemStep 3 - Proposed Actions Released November 2006Step 4 - NEPA Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Note: Documents cover two separate travel management proposals; Public comment period ends Nov 13, 2007Forest Service Contact Mike Van Dame530-934-1141Modoc Status (Updated 10/30/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Area closures in progressStep 3 - Proposed Actions December 2007Step 4 - NEPA Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2009Forest Service Contact Robert Haggard530-233-8840Plumas Status (Updated 5/15/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders CompleteStep 3 - Proposed Actions "First Cut" Proposal -- Issued on April 3Step 4 - NEPA Fall 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Fred Krueger530-283-7840San Bernadino Status (Updated 2/8/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders N/A - Already have designated systemStep 3 - Proposed Actions Plan on minor adjustments through NEPAStep 4 - NEPA Proposed action issued January 30 (see maps)Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Chris Evans928-443-8282Sequoia Status (Updated 7/1/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders CompleteStep 3 - Proposed Actions Will issue as part of NEPAStep 4 - NEPA NOI issued on June 15Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Chris Sanders 559-784-1500 ex 1131Shasta-Trinity Status (Updated 8/20/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory Projected completion Summer 2007Step 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Do not plan on issuing forest orderStep 3 - Proposed Actions Step 4 - NEPA Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2009Forest Service Contact Brenda Tracy530-226-2340Sierra Status (Updated 11/01/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Will not issueStep 3 - Proposed Actions Proposed action maps availableStep 4 - NEPA NOI issued on September 11, 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Note: Public comment period ends December 3, 2007 Forest Service Contact Susan Burkindine559-297-0706 x 4921Six Rivers Status (Updated 10/25/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory Inventory maps released October 10, 2007Step 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Projected completion Fall 2007Step 3 - Proposed Actions Step 4 - NEPA EA released on Travel Management for Smith River NRA & Orleans District Roads EAStep 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Ray McCray707-574-6233Stanislaus Status (Updated 11/17/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Projected completion Spring 2007Step 3 - Proposed Actions Discussion proposals released in December 2006Step 4 - NEPA - Draft Proposal released 11/16/2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Note: Public comment period ends Jan 18, 2008Forest Service Contact Sue Warren209-532-3671Tahoe Status (Updated 10/30/2007)Step 1 - Route Inventory CompleteStep 2 - Temporary Forest Orders Complete -- View Forest OrderStep 3 - Proposed Actions CompleteStep 4 - NEPA NOI Issued April 11, DEIS to R5 Nov 16, 2007Step 5 - Motor Vehicle Use Map Projected completion 2008Forest Service Contact Phil Horning530-478-6210

2984 Hits
0 Comments

4x4Voice BLOG Categories

OutdoorWire Websites

OutdoorWire

OutdoorWire

Portal page for OutdoorWire Access and Landuse Central Read More
4x4Voice

4x4Voice

California OHV recreation news and information Read More
MUIRNet-News

MUIRNet-News

News and information about outdoor recreation Read More
4x4Wire

4x4Wire

Off road recreation and news and information Read More
TrailTalk Forums

TrailTalk Forums

4x4Wire TrailTalk Forums for 4x4 tech information Read More
  • 1

4x4 Tech from 4x4Wire

Jeep Tech

Jeep Tech

Jeep Tech from 4x4Wire Read More
Toyota Tech

Toyota Tech

Toyota Tech from 4x4Wire Read More
Mitsubishi Tech

Mitsubishi Tech

Mitsubishi Tech from 4x4Wire Read More
Isuzu Tech

Isuzu Tech

Isuzu Tech from 4x4Wire Read More
  • 1